Here's a link to the full article if you want to give it a read... it'll only take 5 minutes, promise.
Okay, weather you read the whole thing or not there's my synopsis... see if I missed anything. First, the ordinance is specific to "dangerous dogs" including: pit bulls, presa canario, bull mastiffs, rotweilers and german shepherds. Now the owners of these breeds must:
- register their dogs and pay an additional $20 fee to regular dog licensing
- post a sign in the front of their homes that say "dog on premises"
- keep their animals on leash or in a 4-foot pen.
You guys are are informed dog owners... am I wrong about this??? WE are the people that try to provide healthy and fulfilling lives for our pooch-partners and even sometimes WE don't get our fur-balls licensed on time (if at all) is an additional $20 free really going to help this problem? Yes, a sign warns neighbors and visitors, fine, they can have that one... no issue there. But what about that 4-foot pen? That's the size of a baby's play-pen. How much more frustrated and dangerous is a 80lb dog going to be in a pen they can hardly turn around in???
I don't like this one bit... I think a dog-education class for these dog owners would be a much better way to go. A class that talks about healthy diets, lots of exercise, proper training... and someone to teach the class that can convince some of these people that only PROFESSIONAL dog trainers should ever be responsible for "attack dogs." Now, instead of establishing a program that promotes responsible dog ownership all that has happened is that when a dog does cause an issue... it's that much more likely to be put-down. Sad.
Hum... maybe that's an idea? Can we lobby an amendment for education classes? I wonder... anyway... that's my rant. Where do you guys weigh in? Oh and here... a photo of my not-so-dangerous corgi. :-) This girl makes me smile.
|I don't know what you're talking about... I just DESTROYED that rawhide. Pish, I'm dangerous.|